What felt like the sudden release of Julian Assange - information anarchist, rogue publisher and enfant terrible - was a long-fought victory for public pressure and quiet diplomacy.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
or signup to continue reading
Just as it had been in the repatriation of another political prisoner, Cheng Lei, only eight months before.
In Assange's case, the effort had been led personally by Anthony Albanese in direct talks with President Joe Biden. Others including Foreign Minister Penny Wong and US ambassador, Kevin Rudd were also involved.
It was a hard grind. America's vindictive off-shore pursuit of a foreign national dragged on through five years of solitary confinement, endless extradition proceedings and appeals. The US showed zero mercy.
However, behind the inscrutable righteousness of its resolve, lawmakers and officials slowly cracked. Meetings were taken, arguments heard, alternatives considered. As Australia's former foreign minister Bob Carr had argued, our closeness to the US surely counted for something, especially in light of AUKUS.
"I don't believe the president can shake his head and say, "nope", given all we have gifted - the potent symbolism of B52s, nuclear subs and bases on the east and west coast," wrote Carr eleven months ago, warning we risked looking like a US territory, "as much a dependency as Guam or Puerto Rico".
Ironic then that the tawdry saga would find its strange denouement just north of Guam in the tiny US territory of Saipan.
Let's be clear. In publishing thousands of leaked military documents Assange broke no Australian law, and had not been on US soil when the publication occurred. His defence should have been stronger, earlier.
So this was not merely a victory for diplomacy, it was an important win over the excessive instincts of powerful nations, regardless of any claimed fidelity to democracy, a free press, and legal balance. Indeed it is chilling how seamlessly freedom-loving democracies toggle to capricious overreach, when humiliated.
But this case had everything.
The Australian is not well liked. Democrats could not forgive him for the release of emails from Hillary Clinton's campaign which helped Donald Trump across the line in 2016.
READ MORE HERE:
There was also Assange's retreat to the Ecuadorian embassy in London and rape allegations made in Sweden. Since dropped.
And from the start, there was scoffing contempt from Australian journalists and the government. Just months into her prime ministership in 2010, Julia Gillard said, "let's not try and put any glosses on this. It would not happen - information would not be on WikiLeaks if there had not been an illegal act undertaken."
Successive PMs put nothing into helping him. Until now.
The plea deal for his release is an ambiguous, worrying resolution, but it is one all parties can live with. For now, anyway.
Mark Kenny
Mark Kenny is The Canberra Times' political analyst and a professor at the ANU's Australian Studies Institute. He hosts the Democracy Sausage podcast. He writes a column every Sunday.
Mark Kenny is The Canberra Times' political analyst and a professor at the ANU's Australian Studies Institute. He hosts the Democracy Sausage podcast. He writes a column every Sunday.
